The Teen thing
I can't quite remember all the detail of the "lack of teenagers" thing but I remember that a "teenager" was something created by the americans in the 50's..........erm I didn't write this bit in my diary thing.......something like "a child is expected to be ,for lack of another word, childish possibly selfish, self righteous, something like that... whereas only an adult can enter the kingdom of God" errr I think it's something like that...Mabye you would like to add something normal? you said it after all!
Until Next Time! Farewell!
Until Next Time! Farewell!
posted by Andy at 11:51 pm
4 Comments:
Yes,kinda would like a deeper explaination if poss...why don't you blog on it james?
; ) The TJ
OK, I'd better explain this whole teenagers thing. Here goes...
Sometimes I've heard people say things (I've even said them myself) like "Well, what can you expect from teenagers, they're bound to be selfish" and things like that. Excusing various things (selfishness, insensitivity, laziness etc.) on the grounds of teenagerness.
Now, on the one hand, this can be valid - adolescence can be a tough time which can lead to a certain amount of social awkwardness. BUT - and this is where my (now famous) comment comes in - being a "teenager" is actually rather a recent concept. The phrase was coined in the 1950s in America. "Teenagers" became a phenomenon at the same sort of time as the post-war rationing ceased and people were becoming more prosperous. Rather than having to grow up and become an adult, people at the age of 15, 16 were able to languish in a kind of in-between phase. So they listened to Elvis: youth culture was born. Teenagers (perhaps better called betweenagers) had arrived.
In the 60s and 70s the whole concept became so inbedded, that nowadays it's just taken for granted that there are teenagers and that you've got to expect them to be a bit childish and selfish at times (see Kevin the Teenager, the horrific creation of Harry Enfield...)
But for the vast vast vast majority of human history (and still in most places on earth today) you are a child and then you become an adult. There simply wasn't/isn't a long, drawn out "teenage" phase. (In some cultures there is a "rite of passage" which may last six or seven weeks - hardly 7 years of selfishness!)
In most cultures the age of becoming adult was/is about 13. At this age, you took on adult responsibility.
Mary was probably about 13 or 14 when she gave birth to Jesus.
Now obviously, in our culture today we don't expect 13 year olds to become fully adult (I agree with the age of consent/marriage being 16 and so on) - BUT the downside of "protecting" young adults of 13-19 is that they can become some kind of childish adult: they want the respect that comes with responsibility - but they're not prepared to be responsible!
Please don't misunderstand: I really like people who are between the ages of 13 and 19. I was a secondary teacher for 7 years and one of the best aspects of my job was working with so many excellent young people.
But because I respect them, I don't want to let them lower themselves to childishness. A child can be childish - we can't expect anything else. In a child, childishness can even be endearing. In a "teenager" it's irritating - why? Because, they're actually young adults.
Now for the spiritual angle: Jesus' call to become a disciple (the theme of our household week) was addressed to adults. Sure, he said we were to become "like children" to enter the Kingdom, but note the word "like"! (And he was referring to innocence and powerlessness not childishness). He said "If any man (i.e. adult) would be my disciple...
This isn't surprising because in Jesus' day people were children until they became adults at 13 (bar/batmitzfah). So Jesus' call to everyone over the age of 13 is "deny yourself and be an (adult) disciple". He never indicated that 15 or 16 or 17 year olds didn't have to deny themselves "because they are teenagers afterall".
So - I issued the statement at our household week that "we don't believe in teenagers". Not that we don't believe that people between the age of 13 and 19 exist (no, we're thoroughly convinced of that at White Stone), not that we don't support or champion those in that age range, but that we question the whole concept of an in-between stage where you can't expect the call of Jesus to discipleship to apply.
So, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 year olds - deny yourself, take up your cross and follow Jesus: no excuses!
Thanks James, I dont think I would have been able to write a hugely long explanation so it saves me trying. Is that better TJ?
Thanks guys, understand where you're coming from now james.It was a tad confusing as it was..cheers
; ) The TJ
Post a Comment
<< Home